Uber Vs Uber Eats – What Can Make More Money For A Driver

The choice between Uber and Uber Eats in the UK depends fundamentally on your location, regulatory status, and earning priorities. Outside London, Uber drivers earn significantly more per hour (£11 to 17 net) than Uber Eats couriers (£7-14 hourly), but face higher regulatory barriers and insurance costs. In London, the economics shift dramatically: congestion charges and ULEZ costs reduce Uber earnings by £7,930 – £8,880 annually, narrowing the earnings differential and making Uber Eats earnings increasingly competitive due to its exemption from these charges. Below is a detailed analysis to guide your decision.

Earnings Comparison – Hourly Rates and Annual Income

Factor Uber Driver Uber Eats Courier
Gross hourly (UK avg) £15-24/hour £10-20/hour
Net hourly after expenses £11-17/hour £8-16/hour
Full-time monthly (40+ hrs) £1,730-2,950/month net £1,000-2,700/month estimate
London full-time annual £36,500 avg (pre-congestion costs) £12,000-32,000 estimated
Per-trip earnings £9 -12 after Uber’s cut £3 – 5 before tips

 

Real-world data: A 2025 case study showed an Uber driver earning £16.88/hour gross (£10.39 net after fuel and maintenance), while an Uber Eats driver filming a day’s work earned around £6/hour. Recent Oxford University research found Uber drivers’ median take-home fell to £15.98/hour (including waiting time) after Uber raised its commission rate from 25% to 29% in 2023, suggesting earnings are under pressure.

London vs Rest of UK

Outside London, the earnings gap is clearer. Uber drivers achieve £11 – 17/hour net with no congestion or emission charges, making the premium attractive. In London, regulatory costs dramatically compress profitability:

  • London Uber drivers pay £18/day congestion charge (rising from £15 as of January 2, 2026)
  • Non-compliant vehicles add £12.50/day ULEZ charge
  • Five-day weekly cost: £4,680 – £8,880 annually depending on vehicle type
  • This erodes the Uber earnings advantage significantly

Uber Eats avoids these charges entirely – a critical advantage in London, where the capital accounts for 21.1% of all UK food delivery occasions.

Regulatory Requirements and Licensing

This is where the two services diverge sharply:

Uber (Passenger Rideshare)

Private Hire – PCO License Required (both London and nationwide):

  • London: Through Transport for London (TfL)
  • Rest of UK: Through local council licensing authority
  • Cost: £70-407 annually depending on council
  • Additional test requirements: SERU assessment (Safety, Equality, Regulatory), English language tests in some cases
  • Processing time: 4–8 weeks
  • Background check: Enhanced DBS (Disclosure and Barring Service)

Uber Vehicle Requirements:

  • 4-door minimum
  • 2008 or later (London); 2006 or later (rest of UK)
  • Good condition, no cosmetic damage
  • Licensed to carry minimum 4 passengers

Insurance:

  • Private hire insurance mandatory: £1,277–£2,200 annually
  • Optional: Uber’s Partner Protection covers medical expenses (up to £7,500) and accidental death

Uber Eats (Food Delivery)

Drive For Uber Eats

No PCO or PHVL License Required – major regulatory advantage:

  • Eats couriers are self-employed contractors without licensing requirements
  • No council registration
  • Saves £70–407 annually

Vehicle Requirements (more lenient):

  • No 4-door requirement; motorbikes and scooters acceptable
  • Maximum 15 years old
  • Must carry 30 pounds (feasible for any vehicle)
  • Only need valid driving license and proof of insurance

Insurance:

  • Food delivery insurance (Uber Eats Insurance) mandatory: £1000 to £2,500 annually, but hourly and montly options available
  • Same self-employed contractor status

Net Regulatory Advantage: Uber Eats avoids PHVL, saving money and eliminating licensing delays, though insurance remains similar or slightly higher.

Operating Costs Analysis

Uber Driver (London-based)

Cost Item Annual
Private hire insurance £1,977
Congestion Charge (5 days/week) £4,680
ULEZ (non-EV, 5 days/week) £3,250
Fuel & maintenance ~£2,000
Total fixed cost ~£12,000

 

EV option: Reduces congestion to £13.50/day with AutoPay (25% discount), saving ~£1,170/year but requires a new vehicle investment.

Uber Driver (Outside London)

Cost Item Annual
Private hire insurance  £1,977
Fuel & maintenance ~£2,000
Total fixed cost ~£4,000

 

Uber Eats Courier

Cost Item Annual
Food delivery insurance £2,500
Fuel & maintenance ~£1,500 (lower mileage)
Total fixed cost ~£4,000

 

Key insight: Uber Eats and regional Uber drivers have similar costs, but London Uber drivers face an additional £8,000+ overhead, making Eats increasingly appealing in the capital.

Demand Patterns and Shift Structure

Uber Driving

Uber (Passenger)

  • All-day demand: Commutes begin at 6am, late-night demand peaks until 4am
  • Peak periods: Early morning (6–8am), evening rush (5–9pm), weekends
  • Regional variation: Edinburgh, Glasgow, and London see strongest late-night demand; Birmingham leads in early-morning commutes
  • Weather impact: Rain/snow increases demand, drivers can surge-price
  • Flexibility: Hit “go” and “stop” buttons instantly, unlimited availability
  • Market saturation: Rideshare market is mature and competitive, especially in London

Uber Eats

  • Concentrated demand: Three main shifts – breakfast (6–9am), lunch (11am–2pm), dinner (5–9pm)
  • Off-peak scarcity: Minimal orders between shifts, although supermarket and courier orders somewhat ofset this
  • London concentration: 21.1% of UK delivery volume; market leader at 27.2% of occasions
  • Growth trajectory: Uber Eats reached 11.2M users in August 2025 (up 48% YoY), suggesting expanding demand
  • Flexibility: Previously complete flexibility; some cities (NYC) now require scheduled shifts, but UK remains flexible (hit “go” button)
  • Seasonal patterns: December saw 20% surge in grocery/retail orders, suggesting holiday stability

Analysis: Uber offers more consistent, all-day work; Eats delivers predictable peak-hour shifts but with dead periods. Eats suits those who prefer defined working windows; Uber suits those wanting to earn during ad-hoc availability.

London-Specific Considerations

London transforms the financial equation entirely:

Additional London Costs for Uber

  1. Congestion Charge: £18/day (weekdays 7am–6pm, weekends 12pm–6pm)
    • 240 working days/year × £18 = £4,320
    • Non-payment penalty: £21 late fee
  2. ULEZ (Ultra Low Emission Zone – if applicable): £12.50/day for non-compliant vehicles
    • Covers all 33 London boroughs, 24/7
    • ~£3,250/year for 260 driving days
    • EV exempt (but investment required)
  3. Combined impact: £7,570 annually for standard vehicles; £5,200 for EVs with AutoPay

Uber Eats Advantage in London

  • Zero congestion/ULEZ liability – food delivery exempt
  • Food delivery market strength: London has highest delivery density and affluent, app-savvy consumers
  • Cost structure: Insurance costs identical, but fuel savings (lower mileage) offset higher insurance

Verdict for London: The £7,500–8,000 annual transport charges severely erode Uber’s hourly advantage. An Uber driver earning £36,500/year grossly in London must deduct these charges, leaving net income potentially below £28,000 – less than Eats in some scenarios when considering hourly rates.

Work-Life Balance and Flexibility

Uber Eats Delivery Driver

Uber Drivers

  • Complete autonomy: Work any hours, any days
  • No scheduling requirements (UK-wide)
  • Can use “Driver Destinations” feature to integrate personal errands
  • Requires immediate availability for passenger pickups (no batch processing)
  • Social interaction: Direct passenger contact (positive for some, stress for others)
  • Vehicle must be consistently accessible

Uber Eats Couriers

  • Nearly identical flexibility in UK (can toggle “go” button)
  • Scheduled shifts emerging in some markets but not yet in the UK
  • Batch deliveries: Can plan multiple orders efficiently
  • Minimal interaction (contactless delivery increasingly common)
  • Lower vehicle wear and tear
  • Predictable delivery routes (vs unpredictable passenger rides)

Edge: Both services are highly flexible; Uber Eats has slightly lower stress due to food-only delivery and no direct customer interaction.

Decision Framework

Choose Uber if:

  • Based outside London (earnings advantage clear)
  • Prefer all-day earning potential and passenger interaction
  • Have newer, compliant vehicle (2008+ in London, 2006+ elsewhere)
  • Can absorb £4,000/year regulatory costs outside London; £12,000+ in London
  • Willing to obtain PHVL license and complete required tests
  • Want potential for surge pricing during high-demand periods

Choose Uber Eats if:

  • Based in London (congestion/ULEZ costs overwhelm Uber Eats earnings)
  • Prefer defined peak-hour shifts (6–9am, 11am–2pm, 5–9pm)
  • Want to avoid PHVL licensing (self-employment only)
  • Prioritize lower vehicle wear and contactless work
  • Have older vehicle (max 15 years; Uber requires 2008+)
  • Value exemption from congestion and emission charges
  • Seek food delivery niche amid growing market (27.2% share, expanding)

Consider Both if:

  • Living near London but willing to pay congestion/ULEZ for broader earnings
  • Can manage split insurance (some policies cover both rideshare and delivery)
  • Want redundancy if one platform reduces availability
  • Time-flexible and can maximize both peak and off-peak periods

Regional Variations

Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, Glasgow: Outside-London rates apply (Uber advantage clearer); strong late-night delivery demand for Eats, but passenger rides offer broader opportunity.

Bristol, Southampton, Peterborough: Low driver supply (98–87 vacancies per 100,000 residents) – both platforms actively recruiting; strong leverage for negotiations.

University cities: Strong late-night demand for both (high socializing/eating out); Eats may excel during semester, Uber during holidays when commuting increases.

Recent Industry Headwinds

A 2025 Oxford University study found that Uber drivers have experienced earnings pressure since 2023, when Uber raised its take rate from 25% to 29% and introduced varialbe rates. Some high-value trips now see Uber retaining 50%+ of fares. This erosion may continue, making the choice between services increasingly dependent on London-specific factors (ULEZ/congestion costs) rather than pure hourly rates.

Final Recommendation

For London-based driversUber Eats is financially superior due to exemption from £7,500–£8,000 annual transport charges. Unless you can leverage high-value surge pricing consistently (typically outer zones or airport runs), Eats’ £7–14/hour is competitive with Uber’s net earnings post-congestion costs.

For regional UK driversUber offers better baseline earnings (£11–17/hour net) and more consistent availability. Regulatory requirements are higher, but the higher gross hourly rate justifies the investment.

Optimal strategy: If in London with a compliant vehicle and PHVL willingness, run both services simultaneously – use Uber during peak passenger hours (6–8am, 5–9pm) and Uber Eats during dead periods (2–5pm) to maximize daily earnings without compounding transport charges.