The choice between Uber and Uber Eats in the UK depends fundamentally on your location, regulatory status, and earning priorities. Outside London, Uber drivers earn significantly more per hour (£11 to 17 net) than Uber Eats couriers (£7-14 hourly), but face higher regulatory barriers and insurance costs. In London, the economics shift dramatically: congestion charges and ULEZ costs reduce Uber earnings by £7,930 – £8,880 annually, narrowing the earnings differential and making Uber Eats earnings increasingly competitive due to its exemption from these charges. Below is a detailed analysis to guide your decision.
Earnings Comparison – Hourly Rates and Annual Income
| Factor | Uber Driver | Uber Eats Courier |
|---|---|---|
| Gross hourly (UK avg) | £15-24/hour | £10-20/hour |
| Net hourly after expenses | £11-17/hour | £8-16/hour |
| Full-time monthly (40+ hrs) | £1,730-2,950/month net | £1,000-2,700/month estimate |
| London full-time annual | £36,500 avg (pre-congestion costs) | £12,000-32,000 estimated |
| Per-trip earnings | £9 -12 after Uber’s cut | £3 – 5 before tips |
Real-world data: A 2025 case study showed an Uber driver earning £16.88/hour gross (£10.39 net after fuel and maintenance), while an Uber Eats driver filming a day’s work earned around £6/hour. Recent Oxford University research found Uber drivers’ median take-home fell to £15.98/hour (including waiting time) after Uber raised its commission rate from 25% to 29% in 2023, suggesting earnings are under pressure.
London vs Rest of UK
Outside London, the earnings gap is clearer. Uber drivers achieve £11 – 17/hour net with no congestion or emission charges, making the premium attractive. In London, regulatory costs dramatically compress profitability:
- London Uber drivers pay £18/day congestion charge (rising from £15 as of January 2, 2026)
- Non-compliant vehicles add £12.50/day ULEZ charge
- Five-day weekly cost: £4,680 – £8,880 annually depending on vehicle type
- This erodes the Uber earnings advantage significantly
Uber Eats avoids these charges entirely – a critical advantage in London, where the capital accounts for 21.1% of all UK food delivery occasions.
Regulatory Requirements and Licensing
This is where the two services diverge sharply:
Uber (Passenger Rideshare)
Private Hire – PCO License Required (both London and nationwide):
- London: Through Transport for London (TfL)
- Rest of UK: Through local council licensing authority
- Cost: £70-407 annually depending on council
- Additional test requirements: SERU assessment (Safety, Equality, Regulatory), English language tests in some cases
- Processing time: 4–8 weeks
- Background check: Enhanced DBS (Disclosure and Barring Service)
- 4-door minimum
- 2008 or later (London); 2006 or later (rest of UK)
- Good condition, no cosmetic damage
- Licensed to carry minimum 4 passengers
Insurance:
- Private hire insurance mandatory: £1,277–£2,200 annually
- Optional: Uber’s Partner Protection covers medical expenses (up to £7,500) and accidental death
Uber Eats (Food Delivery)
No PCO or PHVL License Required – major regulatory advantage:
- Eats couriers are self-employed contractors without licensing requirements
- No council registration
- Saves £70–407 annually
Vehicle Requirements (more lenient):
- No 4-door requirement; motorbikes and scooters acceptable
- Maximum 15 years old
- Must carry 30 pounds (feasible for any vehicle)
- Only need valid driving license and proof of insurance
Insurance:
- Food delivery insurance (Uber Eats Insurance) mandatory: £1000 to £2,500 annually, but hourly and montly options available
- Same self-employed contractor status
Net Regulatory Advantage: Uber Eats avoids PHVL, saving money and eliminating licensing delays, though insurance remains similar or slightly higher.
Operating Costs Analysis
Uber Driver (London-based)
| Cost Item | Annual |
|---|---|
| Private hire insurance | £1,977 |
| Congestion Charge (5 days/week) | £4,680 |
| ULEZ (non-EV, 5 days/week) | £3,250 |
| Fuel & maintenance | ~£2,000 |
| Total fixed cost | ~£12,000 |
EV option: Reduces congestion to £13.50/day with AutoPay (25% discount), saving ~£1,170/year but requires a new vehicle investment.
Uber Driver (Outside London)
| Cost Item | Annual |
|---|---|
| Private hire insurance | £1,977 |
| Fuel & maintenance | ~£2,000 |
| Total fixed cost | ~£4,000 |
Uber Eats Courier
| Cost Item | Annual |
|---|---|
| Food delivery insurance | £2,500 |
| Fuel & maintenance | ~£1,500 (lower mileage) |
| Total fixed cost | ~£4,000 |
Key insight: Uber Eats and regional Uber drivers have similar costs, but London Uber drivers face an additional £8,000+ overhead, making Eats increasingly appealing in the capital.
Demand Patterns and Shift Structure

Uber (Passenger)
- All-day demand: Commutes begin at 6am, late-night demand peaks until 4am
- Peak periods: Early morning (6–8am), evening rush (5–9pm), weekends
- Regional variation: Edinburgh, Glasgow, and London see strongest late-night demand; Birmingham leads in early-morning commutes
- Weather impact: Rain/snow increases demand, drivers can surge-price
- Flexibility: Hit “go” and “stop” buttons instantly, unlimited availability
- Market saturation: Rideshare market is mature and competitive, especially in London
Uber Eats
- Concentrated demand: Three main shifts – breakfast (6–9am), lunch (11am–2pm), dinner (5–9pm)
- Off-peak scarcity: Minimal orders between shifts, although supermarket and courier orders somewhat ofset this
- London concentration: 21.1% of UK delivery volume; market leader at 27.2% of occasions
- Growth trajectory: Uber Eats reached 11.2M users in August 2025 (up 48% YoY), suggesting expanding demand
- Flexibility: Previously complete flexibility; some cities (NYC) now require scheduled shifts, but UK remains flexible (hit “go” button)
- Seasonal patterns: December saw 20% surge in grocery/retail orders, suggesting holiday stability
Analysis: Uber offers more consistent, all-day work; Eats delivers predictable peak-hour shifts but with dead periods. Eats suits those who prefer defined working windows; Uber suits those wanting to earn during ad-hoc availability.
London-Specific Considerations
London transforms the financial equation entirely:
Additional London Costs for Uber
- Congestion Charge: £18/day (weekdays 7am–6pm, weekends 12pm–6pm)
- 240 working days/year × £18 = £4,320
- Non-payment penalty: £21 late fee
- ULEZ (Ultra Low Emission Zone – if applicable): £12.50/day for non-compliant vehicles
- Covers all 33 London boroughs, 24/7
- ~£3,250/year for 260 driving days
- EV exempt (but investment required)
- Combined impact: £7,570 annually for standard vehicles; £5,200 for EVs with AutoPay
Uber Eats Advantage in London
- Zero congestion/ULEZ liability – food delivery exempt
- Food delivery market strength: London has highest delivery density and affluent, app-savvy consumers
- Cost structure: Insurance costs identical, but fuel savings (lower mileage) offset higher insurance
Verdict for London: The £7,500–8,000 annual transport charges severely erode Uber’s hourly advantage. An Uber driver earning £36,500/year grossly in London must deduct these charges, leaving net income potentially below £28,000 – less than Eats in some scenarios when considering hourly rates.
Work-Life Balance and Flexibility

Uber Drivers
- Complete autonomy: Work any hours, any days
- No scheduling requirements (UK-wide)
- Can use “Driver Destinations” feature to integrate personal errands
- Requires immediate availability for passenger pickups (no batch processing)
- Social interaction: Direct passenger contact (positive for some, stress for others)
- Vehicle must be consistently accessible
Uber Eats Couriers
- Nearly identical flexibility in UK (can toggle “go” button)
- Scheduled shifts emerging in some markets but not yet in the UK
- Batch deliveries: Can plan multiple orders efficiently
- Minimal interaction (contactless delivery increasingly common)
- Lower vehicle wear and tear
- Predictable delivery routes (vs unpredictable passenger rides)
Edge: Both services are highly flexible; Uber Eats has slightly lower stress due to food-only delivery and no direct customer interaction.
Decision Framework
Choose Uber if:
- Based outside London (earnings advantage clear)
- Prefer all-day earning potential and passenger interaction
- Have newer, compliant vehicle (2008+ in London, 2006+ elsewhere)
- Can absorb £4,000/year regulatory costs outside London; £12,000+ in London
- Willing to obtain PHVL license and complete required tests
- Want potential for surge pricing during high-demand periods
Choose Uber Eats if:
- Based in London (congestion/ULEZ costs overwhelm Uber Eats earnings)
- Prefer defined peak-hour shifts (6–9am, 11am–2pm, 5–9pm)
- Want to avoid PHVL licensing (self-employment only)
- Prioritize lower vehicle wear and contactless work
- Have older vehicle (max 15 years; Uber requires 2008+)
- Value exemption from congestion and emission charges
- Seek food delivery niche amid growing market (27.2% share, expanding)
Consider Both if:
- Living near London but willing to pay congestion/ULEZ for broader earnings
- Can manage split insurance (some policies cover both rideshare and delivery)
- Want redundancy if one platform reduces availability
- Time-flexible and can maximize both peak and off-peak periods
Regional Variations
Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, Glasgow: Outside-London rates apply (Uber advantage clearer); strong late-night delivery demand for Eats, but passenger rides offer broader opportunity.
Bristol, Southampton, Peterborough: Low driver supply (98–87 vacancies per 100,000 residents) – both platforms actively recruiting; strong leverage for negotiations.
University cities: Strong late-night demand for both (high socializing/eating out); Eats may excel during semester, Uber during holidays when commuting increases.
Recent Industry Headwinds
A 2025 Oxford University study found that Uber drivers have experienced earnings pressure since 2023, when Uber raised its take rate from 25% to 29% and introduced varialbe rates. Some high-value trips now see Uber retaining 50%+ of fares. This erosion may continue, making the choice between services increasingly dependent on London-specific factors (ULEZ/congestion costs) rather than pure hourly rates.
Final Recommendation
For London-based drivers: Uber Eats is financially superior due to exemption from £7,500–£8,000 annual transport charges. Unless you can leverage high-value surge pricing consistently (typically outer zones or airport runs), Eats’ £7–14/hour is competitive with Uber’s net earnings post-congestion costs.
For regional UK drivers: Uber offers better baseline earnings (£11–17/hour net) and more consistent availability. Regulatory requirements are higher, but the higher gross hourly rate justifies the investment.
Optimal strategy: If in London with a compliant vehicle and PHVL willingness, run both services simultaneously – use Uber during peak passenger hours (6–8am, 5–9pm) and Uber Eats during dead periods (2–5pm) to maximize daily earnings without compounding transport charges.
